Supreme Court in US hands Trump a victory on immigration detention

Supreme Court on Tuesday endorsed the U.S. government’s authority to detain immigrants awaiting deportation anytime – potentially even years – after they have completed prison terms for criminal convictions, handing President Donald Trump a victory as he pursues hardline immigration policies.

The court ruled 5-4 along ideological lines, with its conservative justices in the majority and its liberal justices dissenting, that federal authorities could pick up such immigrants and place them into indefinite detention anytime, not just immediately after they finish their prison sentences.

The ruling, authored by conservative Justice Samuel Alito, left open the possibility that some individual immigrants could challenge their detention.

These immigrants potentially could argue that the use of the 1996 federal law involved in the case, the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act, against them long after finishing their sentences would violate their due process rights under the U.S. Constitution.

The law states the government can detain convicted immigrants “when the alien is released” from criminal detention. Civil rights lawyers argued that the language of the law shows that it applies only immediately after immigrants are released.

The Trump administration said the government should have the power to detain such immigrants anytime.

It is not the court’s job, Alito wrote, to impose a time limit for when immigrants can be detained after serving a prison sentence.

Alito noted that the court has said in the past that “an official’s crucial duties are better carried out late than never.”

Alito said the challengers’ assertion that immigrants had to be detained within 24 hours of ending a prison sentence is “especially hard to swallow.”

In dissent, liberal Justice Stephen Breyer questioned whether the U.S. Congress when it wrote the law “meant to allow the government to apprehend persons years after their release from prison and hold them indefinitely without a bail hearing.”

Tuesday’s decision follows a February 2018 ruling in a similar case in which the conservative majority, over liberal dissent, curbed the ability of immigrants held in long-term detention during deportation proceedings to argue for release.

‘MOST EXTREME INTERPRETATION’
Cecilia Wang, the American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who argued the newly decided case for the challengers, said that in both rulings “the Supreme Court has endorsed the most extreme interpretation of immigration detention statutes, allowing mass incarceration of people without any hearing, simply because they are defending themselves against a deportation charge.”

Trump has backed limits on legal and illegal immigrants since taking office in January 2017.

Kerri Kupec, a U.S. Justice Department spokeswoman, said administration officials were pleased with the ruling.

In both of the detention cases, the Supreme Court reversed the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a liberal leaning court that Trump has frequently criticized.

In each case, litigation against the federal government started before Trump took office.

In the latest case, the administration had appealed a 2016 9th Circuit ruling that favored immigrants, a decision it said would undermine the government’s ability to deport immigrants who have committed crimes.

The appeals court had said that convicted immigrants who are not immediately detained by immigration authorities after finishing their sentences but then later picked by immigration authorities could seek bond hearings to argue for their release.

The plaintiffs included two legal U.S. residents involved in separate lawsuits filed in 2013, a Cambodian immigrant named Mony Preap convicted of marijuana possession and a Palestinian immigrant named Bassam Yusuf Khoury convicted of attempting to manufacture a controlled substance.

Under federal immigration law, immigrants convicted of certain offenses are subject to mandatory detention during their deportation process.

They can be held indefinitely without a bond hearing after completing their sentences.

In the most significant immigration-related case recently before the court, the conservative justices were also in the majority in June 2018 when they upheld on a 5-4 vote Trump’s travel ban on targeting people from several Muslim-majority countries.

But in April 2018, conservative Trump appointee Neil Gorsuch joined with the court’s four liberal justices in a 5-4 ruling that could hinder the administration’s ability to step up the removal of immigrants with criminal records, invalidating a provision in another law, the Immigration and Nationality Act.

3,685 thoughts on “Supreme Court in US hands Trump a victory on immigration detention

  1. Today, I went to the beach front with my children. I found a sea shell
    and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She placed the shell to her ear and screamed.
    There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear.
    She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is totally off topic
    but I had to tell someone!

  2. I absolutely love your blog and find a lot of your post’s to be exactly what I’m looking for.
    Does one offer guest writers to write content for you?

    I wouldn’t mind composing a post or elaborating on many of the subjects you write concerning
    here. Again, awesome website!

  3. Hi would you mind sharing which blog platform you’re
    working with? I’m looking to start my own blog
    in the near future but I’m having a hard time deciding between BlogEngine/Wordpress/B2evolution and Drupal.
    The reason I ask is because your design and style
    seems different then most blogs and I’m looking
    for something completely unique.
    P.S My apologies for getting off-topic but I had to
    ask!

  4. Attractive part of content. I just stumbled upon your
    site and in accession capital to claim that I acquire actually loved account your weblog posts.

    Any way I will be subscribing to your augment and even I fulfillment you get admission to constantly
    fast.

  5. Hey there just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
    The words in your article seem to be running off the screen in Opera.

    I’m not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with
    web browser compatibility but I thought I’d post to let you
    know. The layout look great though! Hope you get the
    problem solved soon. Many thanks

  6. I loved as much as you’ll receive carried out right here.
    The sketch is tasteful, your authored material stylish.
    nonetheless, you command get got an impatience over that you wish
    be delivering the following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again since exactly the same nearly very often inside case you shield this hike.

  7. I don’t know whether it’s just me or if everybody else encountering issues with
    your site. It appears as if some of the written text within your content are running off the screen.
    Can someone else please provide feedback and let me know if this is happening to them too?
    This could be a issue with my internet browser because I’ve
    had this happen before. Appreciate it

  8. Have you ever thought about publishing an e-book or guest authoring on other blogs?
    I have a blog based on the same subjects
    you discuss and would really like to have you share some stories/information.
    I know my viewers would appreciate your work. If you’re even remotely interested, feel free to shoot
    me an email.

  9. Hello there! I know this is kinda off topic but
    I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website?
    I’m getting sick and tired of WordPress because I’ve had problems with hackers and I’m looking at
    options for another platform. I would be awesome if
    you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  10. You are so cool! I don’t believe I have read anything
    like this before. So nice to discover another person with some original thoughts on this subject
    matter. Really.. thank you for starting this up. This website is something that is required on the internet, someone
    with a little originality!

  11. I think that everything published was actually very reasonable.
    But, think about this, suppose you were to write a awesome headline?
    I am not saying your content isn’t good, however what if you added something that grabbed
    a person’s attention? I mean Supreme Court in US hands Trump a victory on immigration detention
    (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push(
    google_ad_client: "ca-pub-2771087693479384", enable_page_level_ads:
    true ); | LoudSpeaker4Naija is kinda plain. You
    ought to look at Yahoo’s home page and see how they create post headlines to get people to click.
    You might try adding a video or a picture or two to get readers interested
    about everything’ve written. Just my opinion, it might make your posts a little bit more interesting.

  12. Greate article. Keep posting such kind of information on your blog.
    Im really impressed by your blog.
    Hello there, You’ve performed a great job. I’ll certainly
    digg it and for my part recommend to my friends. I am confident they’ll be benefited from this web site.

  13. With havin so much content and articles do you ever run into any issues of plagorism or copyright
    violation? My blog has a lot of exclusive content I’ve either created myself
    or outsourced but it seems a lot of it is popping it up all over the web without my permission. Do you know any
    methods to help reduce content from being ripped off?
    I’d certainly appreciate it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loudspeaker4naija Entertainments